🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, but block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I felt a little nervous initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of votes that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani added half a million supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani get additional support from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president previously backed Zohran now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass half. He has just over 50% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. So it’s not certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any area. Including Tottenville in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. The independent held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added many conservatives on the island with a high participation. I think there was a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it before Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and homeowners all went for the independent. So there existed some opposition. However no, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on whether the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. And also, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I think that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.